What should be done with the outputs from running configuration reviews?

Using the outputs from running configuration reviews as evidence of compliance aligns with NERC CIP requirements, which emphasize the importance of thorough documentation and accountability in critical infrastructure protection. Configuration reviews are a vital part of ensuring that systems adhere to predetermined security policies and standards. By documenting the findings from these reviews, organizations create a traceable record that can be leveraged to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements during audits or inspections. This documentation not only offers proof of adherence to security practices but also helps in identifying areas for improvement and risk mitigation.

In contrast, simply storing the outputs with no action taken or deleting them after review would undermine the purpose of conducting those reviews in the first place, as it would eliminate the opportunity for accountability and continuous improvement. Sharing outputs only with stakeholders may restrict the broader organizational learning that comes from analyzing and acting on the findings collectively. Utilizing the outputs as evidence of compliance supports a culture of transparency and due diligence, which is essential for maintaining robust security postures in critical infrastructure.